‘Game of Thrones’: Jon Snow’s Percentage Twist ‘A Song of Ice and Fire’
With a tragic ending for its primary characters, Jon Snow and Daenerys Targaryen, who represent the elements of ice and fire, the series finale of *Game of Thrones*, “The Iron Throne,” finished the epic tale of George R. R. Martin, *A Song of Ice and Fire*. Jon had to slay Daenerys in front of the Iron Throne in a heartbreaking scene, therefore ending their turbulent path tragically. In this upcoming saga, Jon Snow’s potential rise to the Iron Throne Game of Throne’s fans. However, this development might also lead to greater political chaos than what is depicted in this series.
Daenerys had declared her intention to go on her violent search for dominion over the continent and unleashed anarchy upon King’s Landing, destroying innumerable innocent life. Once her trusty Hand, Tyrion Lannister, resigned drastically in response to this terrible turn of events, which resulted in Dany imprisoning him. Having known Jon since their early meetings at Winterfell, Tyrion pushed him to face the truth: Daenerys needed to be stopped since she had become the biggest threat to the realm.
At first devoted to his queen, Jon struggled with his emotions but finally saw Tyrion’s warning as accurate. Approaching Dany in the remains of the Red Keep, he valiantly asked her about her idea of universal liberation. He deadly stabbed her in a flash of sad clarity.
Once a strong person rising from persecution to command three dragons and liberate many, Daenerys had a darker side that showed up in her merciless pursuit of power. Raised as Ned Stark’s illegitimate son, Jon Snow sought honor by enlisting the Night’s Watch and facing the approaching White Walkers. Along with many difficulties, his path included his own death and resurrection.
Jon’s hidden lineage—revealed as the son of Lyanna Stark and Rhaegar Targaryen—complicated their relationship as it changed among fights against supernatural enemies. This disclosure not only changed Jon’s impressions of Dany but also established him as a legitimate Iron Throne claimant, therefore dividing them irrevocably. In the end, *Game of Thrones* presented a potent but sad ending that captured the intricate interaction among destiny, love, and loyalty.
How would Jon and Daenerys’ relationship evolve if they both understood their true destinies?
If Jon Snow and Daenerys Targaryen fully understood their true destinies, their relationship would likely evolve in profound and complex ways, reshaping the dynamics of power and loyalty in Game of Thrones.
A Shift in Power Dynamics
- Understanding Heritage: With Jon’s revelation as the legitimate heir to the Iron Throne through his Targaryen lineage, both characters would need to confront the implications of this truth. Daenerys, who has long pursued the throne as her birthright, might feel threatened by Jon’s claim. This could lead to a power struggle between them, complicating their romantic relationship and forcing them to reassess their priorities—love versus ambition.
- Shared Goals vs. Rivalry: If both characters recognized that their destinies are intertwined—representing the balance of ice and fire—they might initially work together to unify Westeros against common threats, such as the White Walkers. However, as they navigate their claims to the throne, their partnership could devolve into rivalry. Daenerys’s increasingly ruthless tactics could clash with Jon’s more honorable approach, leading to tension and mistrust.
Emotional Turmoil
- Conflict of Loyalties: Understanding their true destinies would heighten Jon’s internal conflict. He has always been reluctant to claim power, preferring to protect rather than rule. This reluctance might lead him to distance himself from Daenerys, fearing that claiming his birthright would betray his Stark upbringing and values. Conversely, Daenerys’s ambition could push her toward drastic measures to secure her position, possibly alienating Jon further.
- Potential for Tragedy: The knowledge of their intertwined fates could foreshadow a tragic outcome. As seen in the series finale, Jon ultimately kills Daenerys when her quest for power turns tyrannical. If they were aware of their destinies from the beginning, this tragic end might become inevitable as both characters grapple with their identities and what they are willing to sacrifice for power.
A New Path Forward
- Reevaluating Leadership: If Jon and Daenerys embraced their roles not just as rulers but as leaders who could break the cycle of violence in Westeros, they might find common ground. This realization could lead them to prioritize the welfare of the realm over personal ambition. They could forge a new political alliance based on mutual respect and understanding rather than mere bloodlines.
In conclusion, if Jon Snow and Daenerys Targaryen understood their true destinies as embodiments of ice and fire, their relationship would likely oscillate between collaboration and conflict, ultimately shaping the fate of Westeros in unexpected ways. The balance between love and ambition would be central to their evolution as characters within this intricate narrative.
Why Drogon Didn’t Kill Jon Snow?
In the aftermath of Daenerys Targaryen’s death at the hands of Jon Snow in Game of Thrones, many fans have pondered why Drogon, her loyal dragon, did not retaliate against Jon. Several theories and interpretations provide insight into this moment:
Understanding Drogon’s Reaction
Acknowledging Drogon’s Response: Targetary Blood One well-known theory argues that Drogon recognised Jon as another Targaryen. Showing a kinship based on their shared genealogy, Jon was able to approach and even pet Drogon without injuring himself in Season 7. This bond would have enabled Drogon to recognize Jon belonged to Daenerys’s family rather than an enemy, hence clarifying his lack of violence after Dany’s death.
Grief and Loss: Drogon’s reaction can also be interpreted as one of profound grief. After witnessing Daenerys’s death, Drogon may have been overwhelmed by emotion rather than driven by anger. Instead of seeking vengeance on Jon, he chose to mourn his fallen mother by taking her body and flying away, symbolizing his sorrow and loss rather than a desire for revenge
Understanding Dany’s choices: Drogon has watched Daenerys slide into dictatorship and cause chaos at King’s Landing He might have sensed Jon behaving out of a need to stop her from become more of a threat to the kingdom. This information would have enabled Drogon to find Jon’s behavior acceptable.
Symbolism of Family: The bond between dragons and their riders is deeply rooted in loyalty and family ties. Drogon’s choice to leave with Daenerys’s body instead of attacking Jon highlights the theme of family loyalty over vengeance. By taking Dany away, Drogon symbolically acknowledged that family ties transcend even the most tragic circumstances
Foreshadowing Future Alliances: Some fans speculate that Drogon’s decision not to attack Jon could hint at potential future alliances or a deeper understanding between them. With Jon being a Targaryen, there remains an unspoken possibility that Drogon could accept him as a new rider or ally in future conflicts
Drogon’s decision not to kill Jon Snow after Daenerys’s death reflects a complex mixture of recognition, grief, and loyalty. This moment encapsulates the intricate relationships and emotional depth present in Game of Thrones, leaving room for interpretation about the nature of family and allegiance amidst tragedy.
